Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy is a book by Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Director of Scholarly Communication at the. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy by Kathleen Fitzpatrick, forthcoming from NYU Press. Kathleen Fitzpatrick. Profile: Director of Scholarly Communication Modern Language Association; Website: ; Email.
|Published (Last):||23 May 2016|
|PDF File Size:||3.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Contents Comments Activity Table of Contents.
Pages to import images to Wikidata. She proposes a possible model obsoleecence scholarly writing that collects and compiles work in illuminating ways. Fitzpatrick’s study is a must-read, not just for all of those directly involved – academics, publishers, university administrators, librarians – but also for anybody interested in the future of the humanities.
Copyright c New York University.
Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. The book is divided into five chapters, not including the introduction and conclusion: Views Read Edit View history. Fitzpatrick starts the book by deconstructing one of the most important steps in the academic publication process – peer review. But she goes further, insisting that the key issues that must be addressed are social and institutional in origin. All books by Kathleen Fitzpatrick.
Authorship authorship and technology the rise of the author the death of the author from product to process from individual to collaborative from originality to remix from intellectual property to kathleenn gift economy from text to… something more Three: Houman Barekat in the Los Angeles Review of Books described Fitzpatrick’s reluctance to understand obsolsecence as an effect of technologies and processes of production as “a sobering antidote to the vulgar technological determinism that characterizes so much of the hype around the digital revolution.
Retrieved 2 April I think the argument here between ephemerality and apparent immortality of blogs is missing an important point.
Kathleen Fitzpatrick | Planned Obsolescence | MediaCommons Press
Chronicle of Higher Education. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Fitzpatrick continues to develop her ideas of the importance of community with an analysis of digital text preservation in which she proposes that current technical issues with digital text preservation will require social solutions.
Obsolescence undead mla task force overview One: Except as permitted by law, all other uses are prohibited without written permission of the publisher. Chapters titled ‘Peer Review,’ ‘Authorship,’ ‘Texts,’ ‘Preservation,’ and ‘The University’ methodically dismantle arguments for the status quo, with sections debating accepted beliefs and practices such as the anonymous basis of peer review; recognizable, individual authorship; for-profit university presses; and the rejection of open access as a tenable scholarly publishing model.
Fitzpatrick’s exploration of academic peer review has received less favorable criticism. Another aspect of community or collective authorship that Fitzpatrick explores is related to remix culture. This change is a result of the capabilities of word processing, which allows for the swift and simple revision of text, and the digital networking, which enables linking, reader commentary, and version control. If the university is reimagined as a center of communication, rather than principally as a credential-bestowing organization, its central mission becomes the production and dissemination of scholarly work.
Project MUSE – Planned Obsolescence
New York University Press is proud to make many of our titles available in eBook editions. She suggests that scholars use a Creative Commons license for scholarly work to facilitate the use and reuse of material for the collective benefit of the community.
Texts documents, e-books, pages hypertext database-driven scholarship reading and the communications circuit commentpress and beyond Four: In particular, her critique of the traditional mores of academic publication, whereby texts are first reviewed by colleagues and only published if they meet certain criteria, lacks clear “requirements for a proposed alternative system”.
Sandstrom, CHOICE “Fitzpatrick’s Planned Obsolescence —its title a sardonic speculation on the future of the printed book—considers how academic publishing might best resolve this challenging dilemma.
Untitled Widget Planned Obsolescence: Critics have written positively on Fitzpatrick’s treatment of authorship. Portions of chapter 1 were presented as part of an online conference held at Interdisciplines.
These new interactions may lead to roles for the library, the press, and IT as service units that provide guidance during and add value to the scholarly production process. Below is the list of vendors that carry our titles in electronic format. Next page Planned Obsolescence. Fitzpatrick acknowledges that online writing, and particularly the use of platforms that enable reader comments, will require authors to develop a different relationship to their work.
Copyright c New York University.